Should I translate my hotel website? When and how
Translation is now the cheap part of a multilingual hotel website. The real cost is keeping every language current, findable and bookable.
Weeks of silence, or a stack of emails nobody enjoys sending.
A Guest's First Moment With You Should Be Hospitality, Not Administration.
Most operators are doing one of the first two, usually because nobody offered them the third.
Everything that currently happens at the desk, or by email, or not at all.
Dates, room type, arrival time, special requests. Changed by the guest, written straight back to the PMS.
Room upgrades, dining, spa, experiences, parking. Offered at the moment they are actually thinking about the stay.
Address, preferences, who else is coming. Collected once, properly, rather than on a form at the desk.
Passport and ID captured and verified ahead of arrival, where the guest has time and decent light.
Pre-authorisation and tokenisation before they travel, so nobody is holding a card machine in the lobby.
Directions, parking, check-in times, restaurant hours. The questions your team answers forty times a week.
Two things that separate a portal built into your site from one bolted beside it.
A rented portal collects the same information and keeps it. Built into your site, it lands somewhere you can use it.
What they looked at, what they nearly added, what they asked about. Interest is a signal, and it is usually the first one you get.
Preferences, party size, occasion, dietary needs. Captured once and kept, so the next stay does not start from nothing.
Segments built on what guests actually did, rather than on whatever a third party is willing to export to you.
Your words, your design, your domain. The pre-arrival experience reads like the rest of you because it is the rest of you.
They use one that saves them something. A portal that only restates the confirmation gets ignored. One that lets somebody change an arrival time, book a table and skip the paperwork at the desk gets used, because there is a reason to open it.
Surname and booking reference is the usual route, with additional checks where the data warrants them. You can also offer full accounts through an identity platform, and most operators end up running both.
Yes. We work with the property management system's own API, so a change lands on the real reservation rather than in a queue for somebody to re-key in the morning.
Card details go straight to the payment provider and are tokenised, so they never touch your servers or ours. Identity documents are handled to the standard the property and its jurisdiction require, and we work that through properly before anything is built.
They can use it too, as long as the reservation reaches your PMS. It is often where a portal earns the most, because it is your only direct contact with a guest the OTA otherwise owns.
Usually. We would look at what it is actually doing, what guests use, and what your contract says, then tell you honestly whether replacing it is worth the effort yet.
We do, on a support retainer, the same as anything we build. That covers PMS API changes, security updates and the improvements that come out of watching real guests use it.
It is better alongside one. Same login, same design, same data, one continuous relationship from the first search through to the stay. They can be built separately, and often are, but they are designed to meet.